Letter to the Editor : Number of faculty published by university contradictory to data sets
At Wednesday’s University Senate meeting the Budget Committee presented its annual report. The report indicates the enrollment of the university is increasing steadily but all is well in terms of the teaching mission because the administration is allocating money to hire new faculty. Indeed, the student-to-faculty ratio has actually improved.
The more-than-odd matter is the administration uses a reported number of faculty to justify this claim that is fundamentally contradicted by their own published numbers. The administration claims many more faculty than its own reports indicate. There are two sources that have been published for some time: annual reports from the American Association of University Professors and the Office of Institutional Research. The two are essentially the same over time. On the SU Web page, in the center of the main page, the administration reports a much higher number, which makes things look much better. The three sets of numbers are below.
This involves a fundamental issue of credibility. We have an administration that has variously claimed 200-240 new hires in the last several years, but the AAUP figures indicate the net increase is 45 over 3 years or 17 over 2 years. Given the steady increase in enrollment, increases that small mean the student-faculty ratio is rising and not declining.
When administrators are asked to explain the difference they get very vague and cannot provide data to explain the difference. There are two possible sources of the discrepancy. Either the administration is incompetent and can’t keep good records of who it has on payroll, or they are misrepresenting data to make things look better than they are. We deserve to know which it is.
Jeff Stonecash
Maxwell Professor of Political Science
Year AAUP OIRA SU Web
1999-00 817 822
2000-01 825 830 882
2002-02 827 832 927
2003-03 853 859 938
2004-04 856 864 938
2005-05 873 879 958
2006-06 858 865 973
2007-07 881 894 977
2008-08 896 910 993
2008-09 934 944 1031
2010-10 962 955 1049
2011-11 976 981 1062
2012-12 979 1085
Published on February 19, 2012 at 12:00 pm




